A $667 million loss. Revenue down 20% year over year. Transaction revenue falling below the billion-dollar mark. And yet, Coinbase shares bounced 3% in after-hours trading. If that doesn't tell you everything about how disconnected Wall Street's crypto narrative is from reality, nothing will.
—
Coinbase Global just posted its Q4 2025 earnings, and by every traditional metric, it was ugly. Bloomberg dutifully reported the carnage, framing it as evidence of "how quickly a cooling crypto market can pressure even one of the industry's most diversified exchanges."
CoinDesk noted the miss against analyst estimates. Decrypt pointed to Bitcoin's retreat dragging down Coinbase's investment portfolio. The consensus narrative writes itself: crypto winter vibes, batten down the hatches, maybe those regulators were right all along.
But here's what almost nobody in the financial press is saying: Coinbase's pain is not crypto's pain. It's the pain of a centralized intermediary trying to extract rent from an ecosystem that is, by design, engineered to disintermediate exactly this kind of player.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
The Centralized Exchange Paradox
Let's be clear about what Coinbase actually is. It's a publicly traded company that makes most of its money by charging fees when people trade crypto on its platform. It's a tollbooth operator on the on-ramp to decentralization.
And like every tollbooth, its revenue is entirely dependent on traffic volume and the willingness of drivers to pay the toll rather than find another route.
Transaction revenue falling below $1 billion isn't just a cyclical blip. It's a structural signal. DEX volumes have been eating into centralized exchange market share for years.
Layer 2 solutions are making on-chain trading cheaper and faster. Self-custody is becoming more user-friendly. Every quarter that passes, the moat around centralized exchanges gets a little shallower.
Coinbase itself practically admitted this in its earnings commentary, offering the classic corporate deflection: "Crypto is cyclical, and experience tells us it's never as good, or as bad as it seems." That's a fine thing to tell shareholders.
But it's also a tacit acknowledgment that their business model is a leveraged bet on market sentiment — not on the underlying technology's trajectory.
Bloomberg Buried the Real Story
What's fascinating about Bloomberg's coverage is the framing. They describe Coinbase as "one of the industry's most diversified exchanges" — and they're right. Coinbase has staking services, a Layer 2 (Base), institutional custody, a wallet, and subscription revenue streams.
They've done more than almost any centralized player to diversify beyond pure trading fees. And they still posted a $667 million loss. That's the story Bloomberg should be leading with.
If the most diversified centralized crypto company can't weather a single rough quarter without hemorrhaging hundreds of millions, what does that tell you about the centralized exchange model itself?
It tells you the model is fundamentally fragile. It's built on the assumption that people will always need — or be forced to use — centralized intermediaries. And that assumption is being eroded every single day by the very technology these companies claim to champion.
The mainstream press treats Coinbase as a proxy for crypto's health. It's not. It's a proxy for the health of centralized crypto gatekeeping — and those are very different things.
Record Volume, Massive Loss — Do the Math
Here's a detail that deserves far more attention: Coinbase posted this $667 million loss despite record 2025 trading volume. Read that again. They had their best year ever in terms of volume, and they still couldn't make Q4 work.
That's not a cycle problem. That's a margin compression problem.
