Clover Finance Has Crashed Hard – Was There a Way to Avoid It?

On Clover Finance

February 18th, 2021. Clover Finance completes its seed investment round. The new company was planning to significantly improve the existing model of De-Fi apps. Among the main problems of the incumbent firms, it listed the allocation of the entire transaction commission to miners, gas fees in ETH, slow transaction speed, and the inability to exchange data from Ethereum to Bitcoin. The company proposed a range of solutions, including the following:

  • Distributing part of the gas fee to dApps developers.
  • Charging gas fees in the form of the asset itself (effectively, taking a commission on transactions).
  • Parallel transaction processing.
  • A special 2-way peg system was devised for establishing a connection between different blockchains.

According to the whitepaper, Clover has been designed as a parachain on Polkadot. A few words on the latter: Polkadot is a network that allows “specialized blockchains to communicate with each other in a secure, trust-free environment“. Phrasing it as a simple analogy, it is the universal adapter that helps different blockchains in the network — parachains — to seamlessly exchange data. Other remarkable breakthroughs of Polkadot include parallel transaction processing and bridges — ‘special blockchains that allow Polkadot shards to connect to and communicate with external networks like Ethereum and Bitcoin‘.

Sounds wonderful. However, were these techy bells and whistles enough to keep the token price stable?

Whitepaper Under Scrutiny

So, could investors foresee the crash? In order to find an answer to that, I’ve gone through the whitepaper very carefully, and actually noticed a couple of red flags. First, the token didn’t have its maximum supply cap or a transparent supply schedule. Second, no valid economic incentives were introduced behind the native asset, and the sources of demand were rather unclear.

Third, the goals of the project were vague: it’s not clear whether Clover Finance was intended to be a ‘migration layer’ for De-Fi applications transitioning from Ethereum to Polkadot, or a standalone DeFi application. And finally, despite my admiring the ingenuity of Polkadot creators, it’s debatable if the network can ever become a sound alternative to Ethereum. The London hard fork has largely improved the congestion situation, and Ethereum 2.0 is going to utilize the same parallel processing system Polkadot does now.

The moral here is simple — I believe a cautious investor would think at least twice before investing in Clover Finance: a decision that might have saved their money.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles
Read More

Top 5 NFT Use Cases That We Expect To See In The Future

2021 has been a massive year for the cryptocurrency industry, not only because of the bull runs that have already taken most coins to new all-time highs but also because of the trends that dominated the year. DeFi has never been higher, and a new...
Read More

What Is Terra Luna and What is its Purpose

What Are Terra Stable Coins Tugrik is used in Mongolia to purchase products and services, while the Won is used in Korea and the US Dollar is used in America. It's difficult to conduct business in Korea using US dollars or in the United States...
Read More

How To Mint An NFT From Scratch

NFTs saw exponential growth by the 3rd quarter. Its popularity over the last few years captured the interests of lots of users globally. This growth is spurred on by its high yield, and the possibilities it offers for the evolution of the Metaverse. NFTs trading...
Read More

Beaver Finance Offers Hedges With Yield Farming

Beaver Finance is a pioneer in its offerings. It is the first DeFi platform to offer liquidity mining. This is under its hedging solution for Impermanent Loss. The platform features a single asset Automate Yield Farming. The platform also contains an Engine for Asset Allocation....