Here's a thought experiment: open your phone, scroll through your apps, and ask yourself how many of them are really just glorified middlemen between you and a task. Your food delivery app. Your calendar. Your banking app. Your travel booking platform.
—
Now imagine a single AI agent that knows your preferences, handles all of those tasks autonomously, and doesn't need a flashy UI to do it. According to a growing chorus of AI builders and researchers, that future isn't hypothetical — it's already being prototyped.
In a recent interview on the Lex Fridman Podcast, the creator of the viral OpenClaw AI agent app laid out a thesis that should make every app developer sweat: roughly 80% of the apps we use today will become obsolete once AI agents mature. Not deprecated. Not upgraded. Replaced entirely.
The reasoning is straightforward — most apps exist to present information and execute simple tasks. An AI agent that can reason, browse, transact, and learn doesn't need a dedicated interface for each of those functions.
What Exactly Are AI Agents?
Let's get specific, because "AI agent" is quickly becoming one of those terms people throw around without defining. An AI agent is an autonomous software system that can perceive its environment, make decisions, and take actions to accomplish goals — without requiring step-by-step human instruction.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
Think of it as the difference between a chatbot that answers your questions and a digital employee that books your flight, negotiates the price, checks your calendar for conflicts, and sends you a confirmation — all from a single prompt.
The key differentiator from traditional apps is agency. Your Uber app waits for you to open it, type a destination, confirm a ride, and pay.
An AI agent could monitor your calendar, detect that you have a meeting across town in 45 minutes, check traffic conditions, and autonomously book the most cost-effective ride — or suggest you leave now and take the subway instead.
The app becomes the bottleneck; the agent becomes the operator.
The Numbers Behind the Disruption
This isn't just podcast speculation. The data is starting to back it up. McKinsey estimates that generative AI and AI agents could automate tasks accounting for 60-70% of employee work hours across the global economy.
Gartner predicts that by 2028, 33% of enterprise software applications will include agentic AI, up from less than 1% in 2024.
Meanwhile, Cognition Labs (the team behind Devin, the so-called "AI software engineer") raised $175 million at a $2 billion valuation — for a product that writes, tests, and deploys code autonomously.
The investment landscape tells the story clearly. Microsoft has poured billions into OpenAI and is embedding Copilot agents across its entire product suite. Google DeepMind is building agents that can navigate websites and complete multi-step tasks.
Salesforce launched Agentforce, betting that autonomous AI agents will replace traditional CRM workflows. Amazon is integrating agentic capabilities into Alexa and AWS services. These aren't startups chasing hype — these are trillion-dollar companies restructuring their core products around the agent paradigm.
Customer service — AI agents are already handling 60%+ of Tier 1 support tickets at companies like Klarna, which replaced 700 human agents with AI
Software development — Devin and GitHub Copilot are writing production-ready code, threatening junior developer roles
Financial services — Autonomous trading agents, portfolio rebalancers, and compliance monitors are replacing analyst functions
Administrative work — Scheduling, email triage, data entry, and reporting are prime targets for full automation
Content and marketing — From ad copy to SEO optimization, agents are compressing what took teams into single workflows
The Job Market Earthquake
According to the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025, AI and automation are expected to displace roughly 92 million jobs globally by 2030, while creating around 170 million new ones — a net gain on paper, but the transition is anything but smooth.
The jobs being created require fundamentally different skills than the ones being destroyed. If you're a data entry clerk, a basic customer service rep, or a junior code monkey who copies Stack Overflow answers, the writing is on the wall. The transition won't be seamless, and pretending otherwise is dishonest.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
The roles most at risk share a common trait: they involve structured, repeatable tasks with clear inputs and outputs. Think bookkeepers, paralegals, scheduling coordinators, QA testers, and first-line IT support.
The roles that survive — and thrive — will be those requiring creative judgment, complex negotiation, physical dexterity, or deep domain expertise that agents can't yet replicate. Plumbers are safe. Prompt engineers who can orchestrate fleets of AI agents? They're the new power class.
Why This Is a Crypto Story
Here's where it gets interesting for anyone in the decentralization space. If AI agents are going to autonomously transact, negotiate, and manage resources on our behalf, they need programmable money and trustless infrastructure.
They need smart contracts, not bank APIs that close at 5 PM. They need permissionless payment rails, not Stripe accounts that require KYC for a bot. The convergence of AI agents and crypto is an architectural inevitability.
AI agents don't have bank accounts. They don't have government IDs. But they can hold a wallet, sign a transaction, and interact with a smart contract. Crypto is the native financial layer for autonomous software.
Projects in the crypto-AI intersection are already building for this. Fetch.ai is creating an agent-based economy where autonomous agents discover, negotiate, and transact with each other on-chain. Autonolas is building a framework for decentralized autonomous agent services. Morpheus is developing a peer-to-peer network for AI agents with built-in crypto payments.
The thesis is simple: if agents replace apps, then the infrastructure those agents run on becomes the most valuable layer in the stack — and that infrastructure should be decentralized.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
The Regulatory Blind Spot
Of course, regulators are approximately three technological revolutions behind, as usual. While the SEC is still trying to figure out whether a JPEG is a security, AI agents are about to start autonomously executing financial transactions, signing contracts, and managing portfolios.
The current regulatory framework has zero provisions for autonomous software agents acting on behalf of users.
Who's liable when your AI agent makes a bad trade? Who gets sued when an agent-to-agent transaction goes sideways? The legal system doesn't have answers because it hasn't even formulated the questions yet.
This is precisely why decentralized, transparent, and auditable systems matter. When an AI agent executes a transaction on a public blockchain, there's an immutable record.
When it does the same thing through a centralized API behind closed doors, you're trusting a black box operating inside another black box. The choice between those two architectures isn't just technical — it's philosophical.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
The Bottom Line
The 80% figure from the Lex Fridman interview might sound aggressive, but look at the trajectory. Every major tech company is building agents. Investment is measured in billions. The use cases are concrete and multiplying.
The apps on your phone are the horse-drawn carriages of the software world — they just don't know it yet.
For the crypto ecosystem, this is a massive opportunity. Decentralized networks are uniquely positioned to serve as the coordination, payment, and trust layer for an agent-driven economy.
The builders who understand this intersection — AI capability married to crypto infrastructure — are building the operating system for the next decade of software. The rest are building apps that AI agents will eventually eat for breakfast.
