Meta’s acquisition of Singapore-based AI startup Manus isn’t just another big-tech AI deal. It’s a clear signal that the next phase of AI isn’t about better chatbots — it’s about agents that act, plan, and execute software on behalf of developers. (Cover photo: Manus team, Singapore Dec 2025)
According to Barron's, the deal is reported to be worth over $2 billion, with Manus generating more than $100 million in annual recurring revenue within eight months of launch — a rare achievement for an AI startup.
Manus specializes in general-purpose autonomous AI agents capable of handling multi-step workflows like research, coding, automation, and decision execution with minimal human input. Unlike traditional conversational AI, these systems don’t just respond — they operate.
For Meta, that capability aligns directly with its long-term strategy to move from assistive AI toward agentic AI, embedded across Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and its enterprise tooling.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
From Chatbots to Operators
Agentic AI represents a structural shift in how software is developed and managed. Instead of humans writing every function, running every query, or coordinating every workflow, teams increasingly orchestrate:
Define intent
Delegate tasks to agents
Review outputs
Iterate and ship
This moves development from “build everything manually” to “supervise, validate, and scale.”
For companies that adapt early, this becomes a compounding advantage — faster iteration, smaller teams, and dramatically higher leverage per developer.
Meta’s acquisition of Manus is a textbook example of this shift. Rather than spending years building autonomous agents internally, Meta bought a company that already proved commercial demand, real-world usage, and revenue. That matters in an era where AI spending is under scrutiny and investors want returns, not demos.
Why Enterprises Are Struggling — Even as AI Adoption Surges
Paradoxically, while AI adoption is accelerating across the Fortune 500, many companies report mixed or negative productivity gains.
A 2025 MIT-led study found that 95 % of generative AI pilot programs failed to produce measurable profit or loss impact, not because the models underperformed, but because they were poorly integrated into real workflows.
Developer surveys and enterprise reports consistently point to the same friction points:
Over-automation without process redesign
Poor integration with legacy systems
Cultural resistance to delegating control to AI
Excess tooling without clear ownership
In several cases, developers report short-term productivity declines of roughly 20% when AI is introduced without structural changes. The issue isn’t the technology—it’s that agentic systems require a fundamentally different operating model. Organizations built around rigid approval chains and static workflows aren’t designed for autonomous execution.
This tension helps explain why big tech firms are restructuring so aggressively. Meta alone has cut tens of thousands of roles since 2023, explicitly repositioning itself as a leaner, AI-first company. Similar patterns are playing out at Google, Amazon, and Microsoft.
The shift isn’t about replacing people with AI. It’s about replacing processes that no longer scale.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
Popular Agentic AI Is Already Here
Outside the enterprise, agentic AI adoption is accelerating:
Claude for long-form reasoning, analysis, and coding
ChatGPT agents and tools for task execution and workflow automation
GitHub Copilot evolving from autocomplete into an AI operator
Autonomous research and coding agents shipping into production
Vertical agents embedded into design, QA, data analysis, and ops
The technology isn’t experimental anymore. What’s experimental is whether companies can adapt culturally fast enough to use it effectively.
Where Blockchain Fits Into Agentic AI
This shift also intersects directly with blockchain-based agentic services. As agents become autonomous actors, questions around identity, execution guarantees, payments, auditability, and coordination become critical — especially across organizations.
Blockchain offers primitives that agentic systems increasingly need:
Verifiable execution
On-chain identity for agents
Permissionless coordination
Automated payments and incentives
Transparent audit trails
Projects across Web3 — including agent frameworks emerging in ecosystems like Neo, Ethereum, Fetch.ai, and other smart-contract platforms — are already exploring how autonomous agents interact economically, not just computationally.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
As governments and financial institutions push real-world assets, payments, and infrastructure onchain over the next few years, agentic AI and blockchain begin to converge naturally. Agents don’t just compute — they transact.
Related: Fetch.ai just enabled the first AI-to-AI payment—autonomous agents can now plan, execute, and pay for real-world transactions.
Why This Matters for Developers
For developers, this transition is unavoidable. The difference between teams that embrace agentic workflows and those that don’t is quickly becoming non-linear — less like upgrading a tool, and more like moving from a horse-drawn carriage to a spacecraft.
Developers who learn to design and build systems with agents, will define the next generation of software. Companies that adapt early will ship faster, operate leaner, and scale further with fewer people.
Meta’s move makes one thing clear: agentic AI isn’t a trend — it’s the new baseline. And as AI, blockchain, and automation quietly lock into place, the changes may feel subtle at first — but the curve ahead is anything but linear.
If you’re in tech, the next two years will move fast. Hold on — and keep up.
