Bitcoin is down roughly 50% from its all-time high, the NUPL just cratered to 0.18, and crypto Twitter is doing its favorite thing: panicking in public.
—
But here's what nobody in the mainstream press seems willing to say — this correction is actually the system working as designed.
The Numbers Behind the Fear
Let's get the on-chain data on the table. Glassnode's NUPL metric — Net Unrealized Profit/Loss — has plunged into the "hope/fear" zone at 0.18. Meanwhile, the MVRV ratio is sliding toward 1, a level that has historically screamed "undervaluation" louder than a Bitcoin maxi at a central banking conference.
BTC can't hold above $70,000, repeated rally attempts keep getting swatted down, and some analysts are warning about a potential slide below $60,000.
Sounds grim, right? Only if you've never seen a Bitcoin cycle before.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
Cycles Aren't Crises
Market analyst Sam Daodu makes a point worth repeating: steep corrections are not systemic collapses. There's no Luna-style death spiral here, no FTX-grade fraud unraveling, no contagion event cascading through lending desks.
This is a garden-variety drawdown in an asset class that has delivered 50%+ corrections in literally every cycle of its existence — and then recovered to new highs every single time.
Compare this to what's happening in traditional markets. Equities are chained to earnings calls, Fed guidance, and the whims of whatever fiscal policy Congress stumbles into next. Bonds are getting repriced as sovereign debt loads balloon globally.
Real estate requires permission slips from banks and regulators just to participate. Bitcoin asks for none of that. It just... corrects. Transparently. On a public ledger anyone can audit.
An MVRV ratio approaching 1 doesn't mean Bitcoin is broken — it means the market is repricing toward the aggregate cost basis of all holders. That's price discovery, not failure.
What the Mainstream Gets Wrong
The financial press loves to frame Bitcoin drawdowns as evidence that crypto "doesn't work." What they conveniently ignore is that Bitcoin's volatility is the cost of admission for an asset with no central issuer, no bailout mechanism, and no lender of last resort.
That's not a weakness. That's the entire point. Every other asset class gets its volatility smoothed by central bank intervention — which is just another way of saying the losses get socialized to everyone holding the currency.
Bitcoin doesn't do that. When it corrects, holders eat the drawdown directly. When it recovers, holders capture the upside directly. No middlemen skimming. No Cantillon effect. No Treasury Secretary deciding who gets made whole.
Loading tweet...
View Tweet
The Accumulation Signal
Here's what matters for anyone paying attention to the data rather than the noise: MVRV sliding toward 1 has historically aligned with accumulation phases, not distribution.
The NUPL sitting in the hope/fear zone is uncomfortable — that's by design. Weak hands sell to strong hands. It's happened before the start of every major bull run in Bitcoin's history.
Some analysts are debating whether this cycle is "different" — whether the missing blow-off top rewrites the rules for what comes next. Maybe.
But the core thesis hasn't changed: a fixed-supply, permissionless, censorship-resistant monetary network doesn't need a ceiling to justify its existence. It just needs time.
The correction isn't the story. The fact that the network keeps running through it — no downtime, no bailouts, no emergency meetings — that's the story.
Fourteen blocks an hour, every hour, regardless of what the price does. Try getting that kind of reliability from your central bank.
